The smartphone is not just a device but also a revolution. So, the question arises of how the L&D industry gets benefits from it. The L&D sector is the same who utilize the authoring tools. However, as every coin has its two sides, authoring tools have limitations too. Hence, how mobile learning can make its place in the industry by overcoming authoring tools’ limitations.
There are plenty of features making mobile learning unique. Right from the customized LMS to microlearning videos, engaging resources make mobile learning solutions a clients’ preferred option. With this, learners will not have to grind their brains into tedious eLearning modules. What more? Mobile learning modules rectifies the authoring tools’ limitations. Let us explore how.
Drawbacks of authoring tools
Lackluster results without technical expertise
Any authoring tools demand technical literacy. It is because quality implementation produces an impeccable final product. Also, available eLearning software has high-quality engaging elements. So, to deal with them, companies require professional trainers which dent their capital resources. Also, many low cost authoring tools do not ensure quality solutions.
Companies minimize financial investment by choosing low quality or free authoring tools. As a result, disaster awaits at the doorstep! Disengagement of learners and less learning outcomes becomes a daily challenge. This drawback also puts brand integrity at the risk. So, avoid disaster and pick the right resource for the right program.
Less creative control
Taking charge of every detail is a must for quality training. However, authoring tools have limited interactive features that give less creative freedom. Here, clients simply drag and drop interactions and tools deliver the output. So, there is no option to modify or alter the final output. Besides, rectifying technical glitches in this kind of output is impossible.
It is an undeniable fact that authoring tools have interactive features. The sole problem is the number of interactions. Mostly, these tools do not fulfill the professional parameters. As a result, companies land up receiving less interactive modules.
Decreased learner engagement
Lack of interactions and lack of creativity means lack of learners engagement. This list of ‘lacks’ somewhere affects ROI as well. It is because lower quality product diminishes the value of eLearning. Coming back to the above two pointers, it is observed that authoring tools provide modules but with some restrictions. But, training and development are a crucial part of every organization.
So, there is no room for compromising on quality standards. Clients prefer professional elearning service providers designing compelling training solutions. Moreover, authoring tools lack providing diversified content. So, it may contain accessibility problem or fails to meet the industrial training standards.
Know all about mobile learning
Mobile learning is also known as m-learning facilitates learning programs across portals and mobile devices. Today, it fulfilled the learning requirement amid the social distancing era through mobile learning solutions. Computing devices like smartphones, tablets, and mobiles access the m-learning solution.
It ranges from gamification to engaging simulations and customized LMS are its successful examples. The mobile application is a key to access the learning content. It is downloadable, shareable, and accessible on different mobile operating software (iOS and Android).
Key merits of mobile learning over authoring tools
Updating process much faster
Authoring tools take weeks or even months to update the content. On the other hand, mobile learning technology allows L&D professionals to update the same within minutes. Updating mobile learning solutions is much easier than updating conventional authoring solutions. Microlearning videos, bite size lessons and other m-learning modules are easy to customize within no time. Whereas, authoring tools create modules that are less engaging and takes more time to update.
Interactions determine the success of eLearning modules. In this, parameter, the authoring tool lacks behind from mobile learning. Because mobile learning modules are widely compatible with SCORM files working on every LMS. Whereas, there is a less number of interactive features in authoring tools that hold clients from adding or customizing the course.
Gamification is easier
With mobile learning technology, incorporating the gamification element is easier. On the other hand, authoring tools make this process complicated and challenging for clients. Besides, less L&D time means a faster completion rate of learning programs. Engaging elements like games and puzzles develop knowledge retention power. Hence, mobile is an effective medium to facilitate learning programs.